please add security.ubuntu.com to the ubuntu mirrors

Bug #1438025 reported by Rolf Leggewie
18
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Please add http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ to the list of ubuntu mirrors in /usr/lib/apt-cacher-ng/ubuntu_mirrors. I believe that to be correct. I'm running the Ubuntu trusty version of acng, in case, you've already made that change.

Tags: precise trusty
Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

I don't believe this to be correct, as that's really only a temporary mirror for security updates, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Copying_security_uploads_to_updates for more information

Changed in apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

It looks like I might have misunderstood the use here, I'm hoping Marc can clarify whether or not this is actually helpful

Changed in apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu):
status: Invalid → New
Revision history for this message
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote :

We should also wait for input from Eduard who maintains the package in Debian as well as being the upstream dev (thanks for your work!). More specifically, what happens if one of the mirrors in the pool is only a partial mirror? Will that possibly lead to problems?

description: updated
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

This shouldn't be needed. Not only is the security pocket available on all regular mirrors, but security updates also get copied to the -updates pocket after a few minutes.

The only reason we preconfigure security.ubuntu.com by default is to make sure users get security updates even when their local mirror isn't working properly.

Revision history for this message
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote :

Marc, of course this isn't necessary. Acng isn't necessary. Apt can work just fine downloading each and every *.deb file for every client. Caching is totally optional. Yet, why download the same package again when it is already there locally? To avoid duplicate downloads of the same information is the whole point of acng and caching. And to that end, the proposed change should be made in my opinion.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Ken Sharp (kennybobs)
tags: added: precise
Revision history for this message
Noah (noahod) wrote :

I'm a bit confused about this, can anyone clarify?

My interpretation is that mdeslaur is saying that because updates are in the normal ubuntu repositories, and in the sources.list files security.ubuntu.com is listed last, then so long as there is no problem with the archive repo, files will *not* be fetched from the security repo, and thus this change is unneeded.

Is this correct?

The only case I can think of where this will cause more bandwidth is in the retrieval of a second set of package lists (from security.ubuntu.com), and the gap between packages being on security.ubuntu and the local archive mirror.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.