Juniper Openstack

DM: support MPLSoUDP tunnel config on MX

Bug #1672460 reported by amit surana
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Juniper Openstack
Status tracked in Trunk
R5.0
Fix Committed
High
manishkn
Juniper Openstack r5.0.2
Trunk
Fix Committed
High
manishkn
Juniper Openstack r5.1.0

Bug Description

Starting from JUNOS 16.2R1, MX supports MPLSoUDP tunnels. If highest priority encap configured on contrail is MPLSoUDP, and MX junos version supports MPLSoUDP tunnels, then DM should push the below configuration. If the junos on MX does not support MPLSoUDP, then irrespective of the encap priority, MX should be configured for GRE tunnels.

set groups __contrail__ routing-options dynamic-tunnels contrail udp

set groups __contrail__ protocols bgp group contrail export test1-export

set groups __contrail__ policy-options policy-statement test1-export term 1 then community add encap-udp
set groups __contrail__ policy-options policy-statement test1-export term 1 then accept

set groups __contrail__ policy-options community encap-udp members 0x030c:64512:13

Going forward, MX would be able to signal this capability dynamically and so only the 'dynamic-tunnels contrail udp' line would be necessary.

See original description
amit surana (asurana-t)
summary: - DM: support MPLSoUDP tunnel config on MX if junos is >= 16.1
+ DM: support MPLSoUDP tunnel config on MX
amit surana (asurana-t)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/30769
Submitter: Suresh Balineni (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
Nischal Sheth (nsheth) wrote :

Need to do the following:

- The encap-udp community should be added for l3vpn and l3vpn-inet6 routes as long as udp is higher priority than gre i.e. even if vxlan is the highest priority
- The encap-udp should not be added to evpn routes if vxlan is the highest priority

Revision history for this message
Nicolas Marcoux (nmarcoux) wrote :

Hi,

Any ETA for having this fixed?

Revision history for this message
Guy Davies (guyd-7) wrote :

Since this has been pushed out again to 5.0.1, will this be in the next release of Contrail Cloud? This is really important for the vEPC and GiLAN solutions, where ECMP of very large flows of data across bonded interfaces to the servers and across multiple interfaces to the MX are critical.

Revision history for this message
Atul Moghe (moghea) wrote :

Not targeting for 5.0.1, this will be move out to 5.0.2

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote :

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45899
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R5.0

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45900
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45899
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R5.0

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45900
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45899
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R5.0

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45900
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45899
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R5.0

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45900
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45899
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R5.0

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45900
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45899
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R5.0

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/45900
Submitter: Ankur Tandon (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : A change has been merged

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/45900
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/71979ae9c2c0e49b9fe4a2945133dd770205df73
Submitter: Zuul v3 CI (<email address hidden>)
Branch: R5.0

commit 71979ae9c2c0e49b9fe4a2945133dd770205df73
Author: atandon <email address hidden>
Date: Thu Aug 30 18:12:05 2018 +0000

[DM] - Adding support for MPLSoUDP
- Adding more changes
- Changed device schema to have encapsulation priorities as a list object
- Fix review comments

Change-Id: I86ae65ee1c56e7892e1b80daf393cc9dec954abb
Partial-Bug: #1672460

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote :

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/45899
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/287bfd409e31c9e8fafb9f1b8f5d382a7612df8e
Submitter: Zuul v3 CI (<email address hidden>)
Branch: master

commit 287bfd409e31c9e8fafb9f1b8f5d382a7612df8e
Author: atandon <email address hidden>
Date: Thu Aug 30 18:12:05 2018 +0000

[DM] - Adding support for MPLSoUDP
- Adding more changes
- Changed device schema to have encapsulation priorities as a list object
- Fix review comments

Change-Id: I86ae65ee1c56e7892e1b80daf393cc9dec954abb
Partial-Bug: #1672460

Revision history for this message
prasad miriyala (pmiriyala) wrote : Re: PNF design - Contrail Fabric Management

Could you share me, blueprint/spec regards to it?

Thanks,
Prasad

On 4/21/19, 1:13 PM, "Tong Jiang" <email address hidden> wrote:

    + Ankur, Atul

    Hi Deepti,

    I am on PTO on Tuesday. Could you invite Ankur to the meeting instead? Ankur is the feature lead for PNF service-chain.

    Thanks,
    Tong

    On 4/21/19, 1:13 AM, "Deepti Chandra" <email address hidden> wrote:

        Thanks Tong - when in the next week are you available?

        Sent from my iPhone

        > On Apr 20, 2019, at 11:27 PM, Tong Jiang <email address hidden> wrote:
        >
        > I will be on PTO on Tuesday.
        > <meeting.ics>

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.