Juniper Openstack

ignore uplink-* when uplink-incoming-interface-name is N/A

Bug #1736066 reported by Prashanth Nageshappa
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Juniper Openstack
Status tracked in Trunk
R4.0
Fix Committed
Undecided
Prashanth Nageshappa
Juniper Openstack r4.0.3.0
R4.1
Fix Committed
Undecided
Prashanth Nageshappa
Juniper Openstack r4.1.1.0
Trunk
Fix Committed
Undecided
Prashanth Nageshappa
Juniper Openstack r5.0.0

Bug Description

uplink-incoming-interface-name is N/A when APBR rule is not specified, in which case we need to ignore uplink-tx-bytes and uplink-rx-bytes

Prashanth Nageshappa (nprashanth)
Changed in juniperopenstack:
assignee: nobody → Prashanth Nageshappa (nprashanth)
information type: Proprietary → Public
Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R4.0

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/38095
Submitter: Prashanth Nageshappa (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R4.1

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/38096
Submitter: Prashanth Nageshappa (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : A change has been merged

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/38096
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/eca7371469010a1aa3bc4ac22d3492301850ea2a
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: R4.1

commit eca7371469010a1aa3bc4ac22d3492301850ea2a
Author: Prashanth Nageshappa <email address hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 3 21:58:28 2017 -0800

fix throughput when incoming-interface is invalid

uplink-incoming-interface-name is N/A when APBR
rule is not specified, in which case we need to
ignore uplink-tx-bytes and uplink-rx-bytes

Change-Id: I24cd323ef8c561ef8ed4267c41d8bb69c122f603
Closes-Bug: #1736066

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote :

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/38095
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/dd2f41c5bf3279da2d29140e9727840a451544ba
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: R4.0

commit dd2f41c5bf3279da2d29140e9727840a451544ba
Author: Prashanth Nageshappa <email address hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 3 21:58:28 2017 -0800

fix throughput when incoming-interface is invalid

uplink-incoming-interface-name is N/A when APBR
rule is not specified, in which case we need to
ignore uplink-tx-bytes and uplink-rx-bytes

Change-Id: I24cd323ef8c561ef8ed4267c41d8bb69c122f603
Closes-Bug: #1736066

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/38264
Submitter: Prashanth Nageshappa (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote :

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/38412
Submitter: Prashanth Nageshappa (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : A change has been merged

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/38412
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-analytics/commit/764047bd2793415fb3e891ab2f20f8be43c1c3e6
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: master

commit 764047bd2793415fb3e891ab2f20f8be43c1c3e6
Author: opencontrail-ci-admin <email address hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 17 20:51:57 2017 -0800

fix throughput when incoming-interface is invalid

uplink-incoming-interface-name is N/A when APBR
rule is not specified, in which case we need to
ignore uplink-tx-bytes and uplink-rx-bytes

Change-Id: Iba95adb2d6b73beee7f60822ec79ea75e9a89043
Closes-Bug: #1736066

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.