recommend `lxml.html` instead of `etree.html` in document
Bug #2039353 reported by
abcd
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
lxml |
Fix Committed
|
Low
|
scoder |
Bug Description
https:/
it probably should recommend `lxml.html` instead of `etree.html` (may still keep in code) in document since `etree.html` is actually just an alias of `etree.parse` or `etree.fromstring`.
if people didn't read the source code, the document is currently confusing ppl because why there're many different ways for HTML parsing in the document.
https:/
Right, that could use some clarification.
See https:/ /github. com/lxml/ lxml/commit/ 27a9b5da463152b 88a171e5565053d 6ee2462f11