Subfields problem in 111 and 711
Bug #712499 reported by
Marjolein Kremer
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Dan Scott |
Bug Description
Release 2.0 RC2
We created an authority of a congress from a bib record with subfield $a, $n, $d, $c $0(NL-AMISG)81
We validated the bib record but field 111 c.q. 711 becomes red.
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
I'm having trouble reproducing this in my current 2.0.0+ instance, so
perhaps the bug has already been fixed. The validation control map in
marcedit.js says that 711 $a,$c,$d is supposed to be controlled by 111
$a,$c,$d - and doesn't attempt to control the $n or $0 subfields, so
those shouldn't be an issue.
Are these the right steps to follow?
1. Add a 711 field to a bibliographic record with subfields $a, $n, $d, $c
2. Right-click on the 711 field and select "Create new authority ->
Immediately". The $0 subfield will be added to the 711 field.
3. Click "Validate" in the MARC Editor for the bibliographic record.
When I click "Validate", the 711 field stays black.