Better file name for bzr windows installer

Seems reasonable to me.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Renato Silva wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> I thought bzr-setup-1.17-1.exe was for bzr 1.17-1, but bzr version is
> actually 1.17, and the last 1 is the installer version.
>
> Imho a better name would be bzr-1.17-setup-1.exe, i.e.
> bzr-<bzr_version>-setup-<installer_version>.exe.
>
> ** Affects: bzr
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>

bzr never releases -X releases, only .X releases. And -1 conforms to the
Debian numbering standards (which is why I chose it)

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkpvtbMACgkQJdeBCYSNAAM4lQCfZCJK8bgEDp8k5fzGKki+ftp0
NYQAn3MtGEckW2sp1HS9Am4AgWUy5YbT
=km1S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 02:36 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Renato Silva wrote:
> > Public bug reported:
> >
> > I thought bzr-setup-1.17-1.exe was for bzr 1.17-1, but bzr version is
> > actually 1.17, and the last 1 is the installer version.
> >
> > Imho a better name would be bzr-1.17-setup-1.exe, i.e.
> > bzr-<bzr_version>-setup-<installer_version>.exe.
> >
> > ** Affects: bzr
> > Importance: Undecided
> > Status: New
> >
>
> bzr never releases -X releases, only .X releases. And -1 conforms to the
> Debian numbering standards (which is why I chose it)

It is, but debian numbering confuses just about everyone, for all that
it is regular and understand*able*.

Renato's proposal just moves the word setup between the bzr version and
the build version.

-Rob