On 11/01/2011 15:09, GuilhemBichot wrote:
> hello Gary. Does the associated branch fix the two problems stated originally:
> 1) "bzr ls FILE" does not work if FILE is a directory
> 2) it even gives an exception if tree had --no-tree
> ?
Yes. It makes 'bzr ls FILE' list the file, and it works if there is no tree.
On 11/01/2011 15:09, GuilhemBichot wrote:
> hello Gary. Does the associated branch fix the two problems stated originally:
> 1) "bzr ls FILE" does not work if FILE is a directory
> 2) it even gives an exception if tree had --no-tree
> ?
Yes. It makes 'bzr ls FILE' list the file, and it works if there is no tree.