Bazaar

bzr.exe 2.5b6 does not include any mo files: iss problem?

  1. Series 2.5
  2. Bug #941835
Bug #941835 reported by Alexander Belchenko
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Bazaar
Confirmed
High
Unassigned
2.5
In Progress
High
Martin Packman
Bazaar Windows Installers
Fix Released
Medium
Martin Packman

Bug Description

templates/inno/bzr.iss should be updated to include mo files for i18n support.

Tags: win32 i18n

Related branches

lp://qastaging/~gz/bzr/inplace_mo_ignored_955314
On hold for merging into lp://qastaging/bzr/2.5
Jelmer Vernooij (community): Approve
Diff: 57 lines (+17/-3)
2 files modified
.bzrignore (+2/-0)
tools/bzr_distutils.py (+15/-3)
Revision history for this message
Alexander Belchenko (bialix) wrote :

See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/940704/comments/3. I think we shouldn't put mo files into share/locale for bzr.exe, but just into locale.

Revision history for this message
Martin Packman (gz) wrote :

It appears that some changes to the setup.py script are also needed, currently it assumes the compiled .mo files already exist when setup.py runs, before setup is actually called.

Changed in bzr:
importance: Undecided → High
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Martin Packman (gz) wrote :

I've sort of done the Inno side of this. Currently, it just always copies the .mo files to a locale/ subdir. Perhaps it should be an installer option, and do different languages individually? The files aren't as big as I thought though, so perhaps that's overkill.

Changed in bzr-windows-installers:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
assignee: nobody → Martin Packman (gz)
Revision history for this message
Alexander Belchenko (bialix) wrote : Re: [Bug 941835] Re: bzr.exe 2.5b6 does not include any mo files: iss problem?

Martin Packman пишет:
> I've sort of done the Inno side of this. Currently, it just always
> copies the .mo files to a locale/ subdir. Perhaps it should be an
> installer option, and do different languages individually? The files
> aren't as big as I thought though, so perhaps that's overkill.

Why do you need to do different languages individually? For QBzr and
bzr-explorer I just roll everything into installer and that proved to be
a good thing.

--
All the dude wanted was his rug back

Revision history for this message
Martin Packman (gz) wrote :

We probably don't, I just wanted your feedback on what you thought would be most sensible.

Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
tags: added: check-for-breezy
Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
tags: added: win32
Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
tags: removed: check-for-breezy
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.