Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> I'd say "this is how I implemented it", not as "how I designed it".
> I should admit I never realized this scenario.
>
> So my question: do you think current behavior is right? What is your
> opinion?
I only ever use --dead-only. --all would be okay as a default, but if
- --dead-only is the most common, maybe it should be the default.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> I'd say "this is how I implemented it", not as "how I designed it".
> I should admit I never realized this scenario.
>
> So my question: do you think current behavior is right? What is your
> opinion?
I only ever use --dead-only. --all would be okay as a default, but if
- --dead-only is the most common, maybe it should be the default.
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAko JcAYACgkQ0F+ nu1YWqI089ACeMA QQHux83861MRQzW IhRiS4M wdKAi7jOdRwm8DX fg
nCwAnjS2Hp232bU
=u7dV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----