That is simply not true, we have recently merged several changes to these charms with passing builds and functional tests:
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:x/charm-ovn-chassis+status:merged https://review.opendev.org/q/project:x/charm-ovn-dedicated-chassis+status:merged https://review.opendev.org/q/project:x/charm-ovn-central+status:merged
The state of building reactive charms is currently in a bit of a flux and the approach in the charms may unfortunately be a bit convoluted.
We are fortunately working to address this in the tooling: https://github.com/canonical/charmcraft/pulls?q=is%3Aclosed+is%3Apr+author%3Afnordahl https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/pull/634/commits/d17d173d8dc653b446c5b7a63f678a64cfdb4a27
That is simply not true, we have recently merged several changes to these charms with passing builds and functional tests:
https:/ /review. opendev. org/q/project: x/charm- ovn-chassis+ status: merged /review. opendev. org/q/project: x/charm- ovn-dedicated- chassis+ status: merged /review. opendev. org/q/project: x/charm- ovn-central+ status: merged
https:/
https:/
The state of building reactive charms is currently in a bit of a flux and the approach in the charms may unfortunately be a bit convoluted.
We are fortunately working to address this in the tooling: /github. com/canonical/ charmcraft/ pulls?q= is%3Aclosed+ is%3Apr+ author% 3Afnordahl /github. com/juju/ charm-tools/ pull/634/ commits/ d17d173d8dc653b 446c5b7a63f678a 64cfdb4a27
https:/
https:/