Should finite ranges cycle?
Bug #947946 reported by
Jessica Tallon
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crayon |
New
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
I thought I would propose the first question. Currently we have ranges:
1 -> 11
This creates an internal formula for this rather than all 10 values in the range. If we were to pull 0 would get the calculate the first element, 1 the second etc.. What would happen if we pulled the 50th?:
1 -> 11 | 50
Should this display an error? Should it cycle round so the 11th element would corrispond to the 0th? The behavure when you pull a higher value is currently undetermined. Anyone have ideas?
NB: only applicable to finite ranges.
| Changed in crayon: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
| assignee: | nobody → Jessica Tallon (xray7224) |
To post a comment you must log in.
