What packaging are you using? None of the warnings I see from your pasted output were visible on my test packages. cxlflash: empty-binary-package is worrying, a binary package shouldn't be made empty if it's not virtual - what's in the .install file? For "W: libcflsh0: symbols-declares-dependency-on-other-package cxlflash #MINVER#" remember that in the symbols file you have to use the libcflsh0 package name.
Where is 5.0.2661 coming from, is that an upcoming RC? I didn't see it released on the github project page.
Locally I only tested source-package builds and those worked fine. But as seen in the test-package PPA the package seems to build fine on bionic: /launchpad. net/~sil2100/ +archive/ ubuntu/ cxlflash/ +build/ 14497603
https:/
What packaging are you using? None of the warnings I see from your pasted output were visible on my test packages. cxlflash: empty-binary- package is worrying, a binary package shouldn't be made empty if it's not virtual - what's in the .install file? For "W: libcflsh0: symbols- declares- dependency- on-other- package cxlflash #MINVER#" remember that in the symbols file you have to use the libcflsh0 package name.
Where is 5.0.2661 coming from, is that an upcoming RC? I didn't see it released on the github project page.