Group Based Policy

GBP Allows the same PTG to be the provider and consumer of a Contract

Bug #1484425 reported by Magesh GV
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Group Based Policy
Confirmed
Medium
Magesh GV
Group Based Policy next

Bug Description

There is no validation that rejects adding the same PRS in both providing and consuming scope for a PTG.

Revision history for this message
Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) wrote :

Actually this is by design, so lets discuss it.

Changed in group-based-policy:
status: New → Opinion
Revision history for this message
Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) wrote :

Per discussion, a driver can raise an exception if it cannot support this. However API will remain unchanged.

Changed in group-based-policy:
status: Opinion → Confirmed
importance: Undecided → Medium
assignee: nobody → Magesh GV (magesh-gv)
milestone: none → next
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Change abandoned on group-based-policy (master)

Change abandoned by Magesh GV (<email address hidden>) on branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/212676

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.