Opacity inconsistent when pasting object/group
Bug #1343005 reported by
Rachel K
This bug report is a duplicate of:
Bug #233800: Moving an object through a layer with blending options causes the object to adopt blending options.
Edit
Remove
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inkscape |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
When I copy and paste an object that has a Fill and Stroke opacity level below 100%, the opacity of the pasted copy is often significantly less than the original. It seems like there's some kind of multiplicative effect going on, like the opacity of the pasted copy is being multiplied by the opacity of the original, or the Fill and Stroke opacity is being set to the opacity of the layer, or something. This seems to happen when I have the original on a layer that is also set for less than 100% opacity, but I'm unable to reproduce the bug with certainty.
I'm using Inkscape 0.48.3.1 r9886 on Linux Mint 14. This error occurs with all documents.
Revision history for this message
| su_v (suv-lp) wrote | #1 |
To post a comment you must log in.
Similar earlier reports:
- Bug #682036 “Copy-pasted object opacity incorrect”
- Bug #597152 “copied object retains opacity of layer”
- Bug #596180 “some vector objects cause eps/ps/pdf to export bitmaps while similar ones don't”
- Bug #476421 “copying objects in transparent layers adds opacity of layer to object”
- Bug #322124 “Layer style definitions are copied to shapes”
The underlying issue is tracked in
- Bug #233800 “Moving an object through a layer with blending options causes the object to adopt blending options”
<https:/
Please add a comment here (bug #1343005) and revert the duplicate status if you don't agree and think these are different issues.