Launchpad itself

api for blueprint tracker

Bug #146389 reported by Brian Murray
38
This bug affects 5 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Fix Released
High
Guilherme Salgado
Launchpad itself 10.12

Bug Description

Expose blueprints on the webservice API.

A branch which exposes some attributes of ISpecification and IHasSpecifications has landed on devel but it doesn't expose everything that is available. Separate bugs (e.g. bug 682757) should be filed to have these extra bits exposed.

See original description

Related branches

lp://qastaging/~james-w/launchpad/expose-blueprints
Curtis Hovey (community): Needs Fixing (curtis)
Leonard Richardson (community): Needs Information
Diff: 1214 lines (+857/-115)
9 files modified
lib/canonical/launchpad/doc/tales.txt (+6/-2)
lib/canonical/launchpad/interfaces/_schema_circular_imports.py (+12/-0)
lib/lp/blueprints/interfaces/specification.py (+129/-96)
lib/lp/blueprints/interfaces/specificationtarget.py (+19/-0)
lib/lp/blueprints/model/specification.py (+24/-5)
lib/lp/blueprints/stories/standalone/sprint-links.txt (+0/-4)
lib/lp/blueprints/tests/test_implements.py (+61/-0)
lib/lp/blueprints/tests/test_webservice.py (+550/-0)
lib/lp/testing/factory.py (+56/-8)
lp://qastaging/~salgado/launchpad/expose-blueprints
Michael Hudson-Doyle: Approve
Diff: 1054 lines (+690/-99)
11 files modified
lib/canonical/launchpad/interfaces/_schema_circular_imports.py (+14/-0)
lib/lp/app/doc/tales.txt (+6/-2)
lib/lp/blueprints/interfaces/specification.py (+133/-78)
lib/lp/blueprints/interfaces/specificationtarget.py (+42/-6)
lib/lp/blueprints/interfaces/webservice.py (+1/-0)
lib/lp/blueprints/model/specification.py (+5/-2)
lib/lp/blueprints/model/sprint.py (+4/-3)
lib/lp/blueprints/stories/standalone/sprint-links.txt (+0/-4)
lib/lp/blueprints/tests/test_implements.py (+65/-0)
lib/lp/blueprints/tests/test_webservice.py (+395/-0)
lib/lp/testing/factory.py (+25/-4)
Diogo Matsubara (matsubara)
Changed in blueprint:
status: New → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Graham Binns (gmb) wrote :

Now that we have an actual API, this would be the ideal opportunity to expose blueprints through it...

Changed in blueprint:
importance: Undecided → Medium
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
importance: Medium → Low
tags: added: feature
Matt Zimmerman (mdz)
Changed in blueprint:
assignee: nobody → Jonathan Lange (jml)
Andrew Mitchell (ajmitch)
Changed in blueprint:
assignee: Jonathan Lange (jml) → Andrew Mitchell (ajmitch)
status: Triaged → In Progress
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
milestone: none → 10.02
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
milestone: 10.02 → 10.03
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
milestone: 10.03 → 10.05
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
milestone: 10.05 → 10.06
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
milestone: 10.06 → 10.07
Andrew Mitchell (ajmitch)
Changed in blueprint:
assignee: Andrew Mitchell (ajmitch) → nobody
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
milestone: 10.08 → 10.09
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
status: In Progress → Triaged
milestone: 10.09 → none
Revision history for this message
RJ Skerry-Ryan (rryan) wrote :

This would be great for us on the Mixxx team because we could easily embed a list of our currently active milestone's blueprints on our website's 'Getting Involved' page so our website will stay current with what our main focus of development is without us having to manually change it. Any word on when this might get finished / what we can do to help?

Revision history for this message
Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote : Re: [Bug 146389] Re: api for blueprint tracker

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:39:28 RJ Ryan wrote:
> This would be great for us on the Mixxx team because we could easily
> embed a list of our currently active milestone's blueprints on our
> website's 'Getting Involved' page so our website will stay current with
> what our main focus of development is without us having to manually
> change it. Any word on when this might get finished / what we can do to
> help?

Very shortly I'll be doing some yak shaving on blueprints.

What exactly are you after?

  subscribe

Revision history for this message
Thierry Carrez (ttx) wrote :

I was considering writing a blueprint API using screenscraping, but this is definitely the right way of doing it :)

Any project that uses blueprints at a large scale needs this. Even if the long-term plan could be to merge blueprints and bugs, I still think there is value in the short/mid-term to provide such an API.

Guilherme Salgado (salgado)
Changed in blueprint:
assignee: nobody → Guilherme Salgado (salgado)
importance: Low → High
milestone: none → 10.12
status: Triaged → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

Hi Salgado, I haven't checked the branch yet, but could you make sure
its only exposed in devel? Theres no sense putting it straight into
long term support if we're going to be refactoring things in the short
term.

Thanks,
Rob

Guilherme Salgado (salgado)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Launchpad QA Bot (lpqabot) wrote : Bug fixed by a commit

Fixed in stable r11997 <http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/stable/revision/11997>.

tags: added: qa-needstesting
Changed in blueprint:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Guilherme Salgado (salgado) wrote :

This has been QAed and is working fine with the exception of the issue reported on bug 683106. I think that's not a big deal and so am tempted to mark this as qa-ok if nobody objects.

Guilherme Salgado (salgado)
tags: added: qa-ok
removed: qa-needstesting
Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote : Re: [Bug 146389] Re: api for blueprint tracker

qa-ok it if:
 - its ok to deploy

-Rob

Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in blueprint:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jay Pipes (jaypipes) wrote :

"if we're going to be refactoring things in the short term."

Does anyone have a link to something that describes the refactoring plans for the short term?

Thanks,
jay

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

dev.launchpad.net/IssueTracker

Revision history for this message
Jay Pipes (jaypipes) wrote :

Cheers, thanks Robert!

Revision history for this message
Paul Voccio (pvo) wrote :

What exactly is defined as shortterm for the refactors? This BP for the refactor was written back in '06. Just trying to get a gauge on the timeframe so I can try to work around the issues. Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Paul Voccio <email address hidden> wrote:
> What exactly is defined as shortterm for the refactors? This BP for the
> refactor was written back in '06. Just trying to get a gauge on the
> timeframe so I can try to work around the issues. Thanks!

Its not currently under development; its a fairly important thing -
I'd say 6-12 months.

-Rob

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Related questions

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.