No way to approve a person for a team via their /people/ page

Bug #2964 reported by James Troup
14
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Triaged
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Someone mails me saying 'please approve me for ubuntu-members'. So, I look their name up in Launchpad, and it shows me the list of the teams they are approved for.

It doesn't however show me the list of teams they're proposed for (and that I can approve them for). It should.

As it stands, I instead have to lookup the team and then approve them from there, which is non-intuitive, IMO.

Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote :

We send out notifications to team owners when people add themselves as proposed members. These notifications include the correct URL to access the page.

Do you think that's sufficient to mitigate this issue, or should we really list proposed team memberships on the person's page if you are a team administrator?

Revision history for this message
James Troup (elmo) wrote : Re: [Bug 2964] Re: No way to approve a person for a team via their /people/ page

Christian Reis <email address hidden> writes:

> We send out notifications to team owners when people add themselves as
> proposed members. These notifications include the correct URL to access
> the page.
>
> Do you think that's sufficient to mitigate this issue, or should we
> really list proposed team memberships on the person's page if you are a
> team administrator?

It does mitigates it to a degree. But IMO if people have applied for
a public team[1] that should be shown on their person page. Clearly
marked as "applied for but not yet approved" of course, but still
shown.

If nothing else it's useful information to spot iconemon-ers (people
who collect team memberships like Pokemon toys) who I've seen too many
times amonst ubuntu-members applicants.

--
James

[1] I don't think we yet have the concept of private teams?

Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote :

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:38:25PM -0000, James Troup wrote:
> It does mitigates it to a degree. But IMO if people have applied for
> a public team[1] that should be shown on their person page. Clearly
> marked as "applied for but not yet approved" of course, but still
> shown.

Okay. Should it be shown to everybody, or just to people who
administrate the teams the user is applying for? If to everybody, should
we offer to administrators an additional link to allow them to easily
approve or deny the application?

> [1] I don't think we yet have the concept of private teams?

We don't yet -- if you know the team's name you can search and locate
it, and you can navigate extensively through all the team names (but why
would you want to waste the rest of your life doing that?).

Revision history for this message
James Troup (elmo) wrote :

Christian Reis <email address hidden> writes:

> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:38:25PM -0000, James Troup wrote:
>> It does mitigates it to a degree. But IMO if people have applied for
>> a public team[1] that should be shown on their person page. Clearly
>> marked as "applied for but not yet approved" of course, but still
>> shown.
>
> Okay. Should it be shown to everybody, or just to people who
> administrate the teams the user is applying for?

I would say everybody - if team membership is not private information,
I don't see why application to a team should be.

> If to everybody, should we offer to administrators an additional
> link to allow them to easily approve or deny the application?

That would be nice, and is the original point of this bug ... :-)

--
James

Christian Reis (kiko)
Changed in launchpad:
assignee: nobody → salgado
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
importance: Wishlist → Medium
Revision history for this message
Guilherme Salgado (salgado) wrote : Unassign myself from untargetted bugs

 assignee nobody
 subscribe

Changed in launchpad:
assignee: salgado → nobody
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in launchpad-registry:
importance: Medium → Wishlist
status: Confirmed → Triaged
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.