On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Christian Reis <email address hidden> wrote:
> Well, except this is an email, so there's no "click here" (and even if
> it was the web, you'd lose brownie points on accessibility in using that
> phase). Guess a URL will have to be included.
Yeah, that wasn't a very good sketch of the idea. I'm sure I've been
guilty of a "click here" in my web lifetime, but I didn't mean that
actual phrase when I wrote that. I was just trying to capture the
idea quickly while Tom and I were talking about it.
To be more accurate, I think this should take the form of the current
link for direct subscribers. For example,
"You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to foo.
To unsubscribe, go to: [URL]."
Maybe each rationale requires including the URL in a different way,
but maybe not. Anyway, we should be mindful of the phrasing as we
develop this and it goes through review.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Christian Reis <email address hidden> wrote:
> Well, except this is an email, so there's no "click here" (and even if
> it was the web, you'd lose brownie points on accessibility in using that
> phase). Guess a URL will have to be included.
Yeah, that wasn't a very good sketch of the idea. I'm sure I've been
guilty of a "click here" in my web lifetime, but I didn't mean that
actual phrase when I wrote that. I was just trying to capture the
idea quickly while Tom and I were talking about it.
To be more accurate, I think this should take the form of the current
link for direct subscribers. For example,
"You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to foo.
To unsubscribe, go to: [URL]."
Maybe each rationale requires including the URL in a different way,
but maybe not. Anyway, we should be mindful of the phrasing as we
develop this and it goes through review.