By changing the CHUNKSIZE from 64 KiB to 1 MiB, it looks like the CPU was used more efficiently and it does the trick.
2023-05-17 11:54:23.080 376143 DEBUG cinder.image.image_utils [req-8228848b-f037-4a6a-802e-de7ffe62bae6 a32b8e6ed20f484eba8ddae8f7b6eb1e 08dd29cd8676470c8e0b73d2667f8cf0 - - -] Image fetch details: dest /var/lib/cinder/conversion/image_fetch_741953c3-08f7-43b6-b423-2be938ac8d02_gnmu2b9ycinder@cinder-ceph, size 1907.35 MB, duration 14.44 sec fetch /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cinder/image/i mage_utils.py:639 2023-05-17 11:54:23.080 376143 INFO cinder.image.image_utils [req-8228848b-f037-4a6a-802e-de7ffe62bae6 a32b8e6ed20f484eba8ddae8f7b6eb1e 08dd29cd8676470c8e0b73d2667f8cf0 - - -] Image download 1907.3 5 MB at 132.10 MB/s
-> 1,057 Mbps
`openstack image save` with openstacksdk has a similar issue so I reported it separately as: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010759
By changing the CHUNKSIZE from 64 KiB to 1 MiB, it looks like the CPU was used more efficiently and it does the trick.
2023-05-17 11:54:23.080 376143 DEBUG cinder. image.image_ utils [req-8228848b- f037-4a6a- 802e-de7ffe62ba e6 a32b8e6ed20f484 eba8ddae8f7b6eb 1e 08dd29cd8676470 c8e0b73d2667f8c f0 - - -] Image fetch details: cinder/ conversion/ image_fetch_ 741953c3- 08f7-43b6- b423-2be938ac8d 02_gnmu2b9ycind er@cinder- ceph, size 1907.35 MB, duration 14.44 sec fetch /usr/lib/ python3/ dist-packages/ cinder/ image/i image.image_ utils [req-8228848b- f037-4a6a- 802e-de7ffe62ba e6 a32b8e6ed20f484 eba8ddae8f7b6eb 1e 08dd29cd8676470 c8e0b73d2667f8c f0 - - -] Image download 1907.3
dest /var/lib/
mage_utils.py:639
2023-05-17 11:54:23.080 376143 INFO cinder.
5 MB at 132.10 MB/s
-> 1,057 Mbps
`openstack image save` with openstacksdk has a similar issue so I reported it separately as: /storyboard. openstack. org/#!/ story/2010759
https:/