Is it possible to support more atypical field types, like OneToOne, OneToMany etc?
Bug #1099396 reported by
Mike Stoddart
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RiakAlchemy |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Is it possible to support more atypical field types, like OneToOne, OneToMany etc? The only current option is to reference multiple objects, which doesn't always make sense. I realise this is trying to add SQL like features to a NoSQL DB.
To post a comment you must log in.
