Comment 2 for bug 1900783

Revision history for this message
Olivier Tilloy (osomon) wrote :

Thanks for the report Alexander. This is a concerning regression indeed.
I see in the data attached by apport that you're using the chromium snap from the beta channel.
Were you installing from the beta channel in both cases? Does switching to the stable channel make a difference?

Could you run chromium with the following command in both configurations, and attach the output printed in the terminal after closing the window?

    snap run --trace-exec chromium

Thanks!