Deb version numbering is misleading

I'm proposing changing the version number from 1:85.0.4183.83-0ubuntu3 to 2:1+snap, similar to what Firefox does.

The attachment "chromium.diff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by ~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

Thank you for this suggestion.
Even though bumping the epoch is a very big hammer, it sounds very sensible to me.
The patch is looking mostly good, too.

But I wonder if we should rather change the version number to "2:1snap1-0ubuntu1", in order to use a similar format as we have on Firefox (LP: #1892724)? What do you think?

Hi Lukas, thanks for having a look!

> But I wonder if we should rather change the version number to
> "2:1snap1-0ubuntu1", in order to use a similar format as we have on
> Firefox (LP: #1892724)? What do you think?

So, my hunch reaction to that scheme is "god, are all those numbers
really meaningful and necessary?" Being this is a package that installs
a snap, with all the upstream and almost all downstream changes handled
in the snap, I couldn't think in a way we would benefit from more than
one "free" (i.e., not epoch) number, and that is why I suggested a
simpler scheme — just for the principle of parcimony's sake.

Now, there can definitely be shortsight from my side, as I'm usually
only bumping version numbers, not reworking or creating them. At any
rate, both schemes solve the problem of misleading users, and I'm glad
to change to either.

One argument for having 'ubuntu' in the version usually is that it will prevent the autosync job to override the revision (in case Debian would also bump their epoch to 2 and have a version higher) but having the package added to the sync blocklist would achieve the same result. Either way seems fine to me, it's just a deb version which is something most users will not ever notice or care about (the current thunderbird SRU version In lunar for example is 1:115.3.1+build1-0ubuntu0.23.04.1... ;-)

Thanks for the background, let's use 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 then.

I have uploaded this and unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. Please feel free to resubscribe if you have anything else that needs to be sponsored.