head crashed with SIGSEGV in translit_from_tbl()

Bug #1019548 reported by Pierre De Bruyn
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
coreutils (Ubuntu)
New
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

during upgrade to 11.10

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: coreutils 8.5-1ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-15.61-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-15-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jun 30 12:16:52 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/head
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: head -n1
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=nl_NL:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x51ea74: add %al,(%eax)
 PC (0x0051ea74) ok
 source "%al" ok
 destination "(%eax)" (0xffffffff) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: coreutils
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 strncasecmp () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? ()
Title: head crashed with SIGSEGV in strncasecmp()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2012-06-30 (0 days ago)
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
Pierre De Bruyn (tiopedro48) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote :

StacktraceTop:
 translit_from_tbl () from /tmp/tmpeI_5id/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 _IO_2_1_stdout_ () from /tmp/tmpeI_5id/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? ()

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stacktrace.txt
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : ThreadStacktrace.txt
Changed in checkbox (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
summary: - head crashed with SIGSEGV in strncasecmp()
+ head crashed with SIGSEGV in translit_from_tbl()
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
Revision history for this message
Daniel Manrique (roadmr) wrote :

Not a checkbox bug. Marking invalid.

visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Daniel Manrique (roadmr) wrote :

On second thought, assigning to coreutils, where it belongs.

affects: checkbox (Ubuntu) → coreutils (Ubuntu)
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.