linux: 2.6.32-70.137 -proposed tracker
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kernel SRU Workflow |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Automated-testing |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Canonical Kernel Team | ||
Certification-testing |
Invalid
|
Medium
|
Canonical Hardware Certification | ||
Prepare-package |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Luis Henriques | ||
Prepare-package-lbm |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Luis Henriques | ||
Prepare-package-meta |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Luis Henriques | ||
Prepare-package-ports-meta |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Luis Henriques | ||
Promote-to-proposed |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Adam Conrad | ||
Promote-to-security |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team | ||
Promote-to-updates |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Adam Conrad | ||
Regression-testing |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Canonical Platform QA Team | ||
Security-signoff |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Canonical Security Team | ||
Verification-testing |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Canonical Kernel Team | ||
linux (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Lucid |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
This bug is for tracking the 2.6.32-70.137 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https:/
kernel-
kernel-
kernel-
kernel-
kernel-
ppa-package-
kernel-
kernel-
kernel-
tags: | added: kernel-release-tracking-bug |
tags: | added: lucid |
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow: | |
status: | New → In Progress |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Invalid |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Lucid): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |

Luis Henriques (henrix) wrote : | #1 |

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Packages available | #2 |
All builds are complete, packages in this bug can be copied to -proposed.
Derivative packages from packages here can be worked on, the following tracking bugs were opened for them:
linux-ec2 - bug 1401050
description: | updated |

Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote : | #3 |
Copied to -proposed and overrides adjusted.
description: | updated |

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Packages outside of proper component | #4 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -proposed pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-proposed to Fix Released again
description: | updated |
tags: | added: qa-testing-passed |

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #5 |
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.32-70.137
---------------
linux (2.6.32-70.137) lucid; urgency=low
[ Luis Henriques ]
* Release Tracking Bug
- LP: #1400654
[ Upstream Kernel Changes ]
* x86_64, traps: Stop using IST for #SS
- LP: #1398795
- CVE-2014-9090
* x86, kvm: Clear paravirt_enabled on KVM guests for espfix32's benefit
- LP: #1400314
- CVE-2014-8134
-- Luis Henriques <email address hidden> Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:25:44 +0000
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Lucid): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
description: | updated |

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #6 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #7 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again
description: | updated |
description: | updated |

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #8 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #9 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again
description: | updated |

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #10 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #11 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #12 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #13 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #14 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #15 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #16 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #18 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #19 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #22 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #23 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #24 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #25 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #26 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #27 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #28 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #29 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #30 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #31 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #32 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #33 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #34 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #35 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #36 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #37 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #38 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #39 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #40 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #41 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #42 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #43 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #44 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #45 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #46 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #47 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #48 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #49 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #50 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #51 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #52 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #53 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -security pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-security to Fix Released again

Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : | #54 |
The following packages ended up in the wrong component in the -updates pocket:
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
linux-backports
Once this is fixed, set the promote-to-updates to Fix Released again
Please do NOT upload this kernel into -proposed before 2.6.32-69.136 is released.