Comment 3 for bug 2015827

Revision history for this message
Allan G Soeby (soeby) wrote :

Du ChengEn, I would second Jan's opinion.

This whole chain of fixes that has gone in to fix LP: #2003053, should be rolled back. There where no heavy arguments to cherry-pick those changes in the first place. (It is not in upstream LTS either).

Once it was discovered what kind of impact it had, it should have been rolled back.

As it is also now clear that LP: #2003053 cannot be solved without impacting other use-cases, and by only introducing an extra mount-option, this is just another argument for reverting this set of patches.