So this seems like a dup of bug 1240757. As noted there the correct answer appears to be to implement .d directory support in bind9.
Should we mark this a dup of that and mark it as affecting lxd?
So this seems like a dup of bug 1240757. As noted there the correct answer
appears to be to implement .d directory support in bind9.
Should we mark this a dup of that and mark it as affecting lxd?