[upstream] Two sddm bugs with 16.04 – MIT-Magic cookie unpredictable for VNC / option "hideshell" buggy
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sddm (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
SDDM with 16.04 LTS introduces two new problems that did not exist with 15.10 or 14.04:
1. The option HideShells in /etc/sddm.conf does not work correctly. When more than one shell is specified, the filter does not work and the matching users are listed in the greeting screen notwithstanding.
2. The xauthority (or MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE) file is no longer at /var/run/sddm/:0 but at an unpredictable location like /var/run/
Especially the second bug is uncool with Ubuntu server for remote root servers.
Versions installed at time of bug-report:
sddm 0.13.0-1ubuntu5: amd64 i386
x11-vnc 0.9.13-1.2build1: amd64 i386
Upstream bug-reports:
[1] https:/
(HideShells not working when multiple shells are specified)_
[2] https:/
(MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE file location is unpredictable)
Changed in sddm (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → New |
summary: |
- Two sddm bugs with 16.04 + [upstream] Two sddm bugs with 16.04 |
description: | updated |
summary: |
- [upstream] Two sddm bugs with 16.04 + [upstream] Two sddm bugs with 16.04 – MIT-Magic cookie unpredictable for + VNC / option "hideshell" buggy |
tags: | added: kubuntu |
tags: | added: xenial |
description: | updated |
Changed in sddm (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
hi!
I'm not aware if the second problem you are describing is a missing feature in SDDM.
To my opion it would be best to report this directly within the upstream project:
https:/ /github. com/sddm/ sddm/issues
Just found an older bug-report [1] that may be related or not.
[1] https:/ /github. com/sddm/ sddm/issues/ 273 (pam_ssh variables are not exported to session)
It will assist to mention the external bug no. here for follow-up.