\includepdf and \includepdfmerge behave differently reg. doublepages option

Bug #732083 reported by Muelli
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
texlive-base (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: texlive-base

From the manual: "The \includepdfmerge command uses the same options as \includepdf". It doesn't mention there to be differences in the semantics. However, the commands behave differently as can be seen in the attached PDFs.

$ cat a-includepdf.tex
\batchmode
\documentclass[a4paper,landscape]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{pdfpages}

\begin{document}
\includepdf[pages=-,nup=2x1,doublepages=true,frame=false]{source-1.pdf}
\end{document}
$ cat a-includepdfmerge.tex
\batchmode
\documentclass[a4paper,landscape]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{pdfpages}

\begin{document}
\includepdfmerge[,nup=2x1,doublepages=true,frame=false]{source-1.pdf,-}
\end{document}
$

The generated PDFs are attached.
They look different. However, I would have expected them to look the same.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: texlive-latex-recommended 2009-10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-2.29-generic 2.6.38-rc3
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-2-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Mar 9 17:21:30 2011
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: texlive-base

Revision history for this message
Muelli (ubuntu-bugs-auftrags-killer) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Muelli (ubuntu-bugs-auftrags-killer) wrote :

Generated PDF with the includepdfmerge command

Revision history for this message
Muelli (ubuntu-bugs-auftrags-killer) wrote :

some random source file

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.