unity8 test failures in trusty
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
unity-notifications |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Lars Karlitski | ||
notify-osd (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Lars Karlitski | ||
unity8 (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Critical
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
The following tests are failing according to cu2d in trusty:
unity8.
unity8.
unity8.
unity8.
unity8.
unity8.
unity8.
unity8.
unity8.
unity8.
We're now still using autopilot 1.3 branch, so the problems of the 1.4 branch should not affect this.
Related branches
- Michał Sawicz: Approve
- Jussi Pakkanen (community): Approve
- PS Jenkins bot (community): Approve (continuous-integration)
-
Diff: 15 lines (+4/-1)1 file modifiedsrc/NotificationPlugin.cpp (+4/-1)
- Mirco Müller (community): Approve
- PS Jenkins bot (community): Approve (continuous-integration)
-
Diff: 12 lines (+1/-1)1 file modifiedsrc/dbus.c (+1/-1)
Changed in unity8: | |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in unity8: | |
assignee: | Michał Sawicz (saviq) → Mirco Müller (macslow) |
status: | In Progress → Invalid |
Changed in notify-osd: | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
Changed in unity-notifications: | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
Changed in notify-osd: | |
assignee: | nobody → Lars Uebernickel (larsu) |
Changed in unity-notifications: | |
assignee: | nobody → Lars Uebernickel (larsu) |
Changed in unity8: | |
assignee: | Mirco Müller (macslow) → nobody |
affects: | notify-osd → notify-osd (Ubuntu) |
Changed in unity-notifications: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Changed in notify-osd (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
affects: | unity8 → unity8 (Ubuntu) |
The AP-tests for notifications didn't change recently, so there's no possible regression introduced.
Looking through the attached log, this seems to be the typical timing-issue with the system running the test being so slow to respond, that the 10-seconds waiting-threshold is passed, causing these false positives.
Under Saucy this happend sometimes, but solved itself in the next run. Should this keep occuring we need to look into it. So right now, I'd say ignore it. It's a false positive.