Comment 3 for bug 2015801
Revision history for this message
| Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote Re: [Bug 2015801] Re: gcc-10 backport to bionic needed for grub2 | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
2472118
demo site
(Get the code!)
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:51:41PM -0000, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> You also cannot necessarily produce working binaries without the correct
> versions of binutils. Stuff fails with sections not being aligned and
> issues like that. Everything messy.
> I do not think we are super interested in gcc-10 backporting right now,
> grub needs to move to gcc-12 soon anyhow, Debian already moved.
Why does it "need" to move to gcc-12? Details required.
I don't care if we wind up with gcc-10 or gcc-12 as the build-dependency, so
long as we have that build-dependency satisfied in our supported series.
> Starting with the opening of lunar+1, stable fwupd-efi, grub, shim
> releases will be built from lunar.
Sure. Doesn't change the overall requirements!