Comment 9 for bug 1097915

Bill: I would be in favour of getting this in ASAP and working on a separate bug to address display of conjoined items in search results; in theory the right way to do that would be via the unapi database function, rather than issuing separate calls on a per-bib / per-copy basis (where I once again fear performance degradation).

It's different enough that I think this branch (in some sort of squashed fashion) is a win on its own. Glad to hear that it seems to be doing what you need, I think it does what we would need too.