Comment 1 for bug 1243746

Based on a quick read of the code, I suspect the problem could be mitigated by just adding a

get_graphic_880s(target_field='264');

right after the existing get_graphic_880s(target_field='260'); line, similar to what we do for authors of the 100, 110, 111 variety.

880s can apply to pretty much every field in MARC *ahem* RDA as expressed in MARC; http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd264.html shows the $8 subfield for linked fields, for example.

If we do not have any sample RDA records in our sample records, it would be great to have some so we can more easily test out these theories! Can you supply a few?