Comment 5 for bug 1750025

Revision history for this message
Josh Stompro (u-launchpad-stompro-org) wrote :

Does anyone have ideas on how this should be fixed?

The old logic went through each subfield and built the series links by creating a new <a> for each subfield, that included all the previous subfields in the search link for that specific subfield.

Should the new displayfield code in templates/opac/parts/record/series.tt2 handle this?

Should it just split the string on ; and build out the multiple links from there?

Or should the displayfield definition for series exclude the subfield v?

Josh