Comment 2 for bug 1763050
Revision history for this message
| Thomas Preud'homme (thomas-preudhomme) wrote | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
demo site
(Get the code!)
The problem is not LTO specific in my opinion. I think the LTO factor here is that the function with this LDR gets too large and the assembler generates a pc-relative ldr to a literal pool entry which is too far from the ldr. It should be reproducible by setting a big enough value for the function being assembled.