Comment 3 for bug 1600203

Revision history for this message
su_v (suv-lp) wrote :

IMvHO a duplicate ...

A somewhat dated (with regard to the timeline of SVG recommendations actually published by the W3C) and technical explanation is included in the original FAQ, describing the long-standing, known issue / consequences of a decision made a long time ago by the 'Inkscape' project to implement a feature (flowed text) based on a draft version of a (unfinished and later dropped) SVG specification (SVG 1.2 never replaced current REC SVG 1.1, the next REC will be SVG2):
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/FAQ#What_about_flowed_text.3F