On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 07:02:02AM -0000, Rygle wrote:
> The DOS window is still a problem, and I thought the patches included
> above should have fixed it, but they didn't seem to, so I didn't include
> pythonw in the 0.46 release. It's only a minor irritation. Perhaps we
> could figure this out for 0.46.1, since it's mainly a packaging thing?
I have been fiddling with this issue a bit today and it seems that
changing the build.xml to do -mconsole rather than -mwindows makes the DOS
window disappear (and thus takes popper use of pythonw).
PythonW.exe is now included in the build so this does not seem to be related
to packaging.
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 07:02:02AM -0000, Rygle wrote:
> The DOS window is still a problem, and I thought the patches included
> above should have fixed it, but they didn't seem to, so I didn't include
> pythonw in the 0.46 release. It's only a minor irritation. Perhaps we
> could figure this out for 0.46.1, since it's mainly a packaging thing?
I have been fiddling with this issue a bit today and it seems that
changing the build.xml to do -mconsole rather than -mwindows makes the DOS
window disappear (and thus takes popper use of pythonw).
PythonW.exe is now included in the build so this does not seem to be related
to packaging.
-- marcin. floryan. pl/ [GPG Key ID: 0D5581C5]
Marcin Floryan
http://