Yes, my results look like yours. It is only unusable at 1600%.
The both settings are in the fastest mode.
It's not really that slow without much zoom, but with Inkscape 0.46 it is faster.
---
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:09:34 +0000
> From: <email address hidden>
> To: <email address hidden>
> Subject: [Bug 315079] Re: SVN Slow view latency with filters (probably libpoppler issue)
>
> Fernando, it's not so slow for me (AMD 2GHz, 2GB RAM). In your example I
> can go down to 800% on the blur zone and it's slow but still quite
> usable. The whole screen is refreshed in 4 seconds at most (when I
> minimize and maximize). How deep did you zoom in? How long it takes -in
> seconds- to redraw the screen?
>
> Remember that there are two preferences: blur quality and filters
> quality. If only blur is that slow, change the blur (not filters)
> quality setting to lowest quality. Maybe it wasn't clear in my message
> #1, since I used the word "filter" instead of "blur".
>
> --
> SVN Slow view latency with filters (probably libpoppler issue)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315079
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Inkscape: A Vector Drawing Tool: New
>
> Bug description:
> When upgrading to SVN, that starts using libpoppler.so.4 and libpoppler-glib.so.4 , when you get closer to a blurred box, for example, it gets really slow to refresh the view when you scroll or move.
>
> To test it, I used the Ubuntu's stable version 0.46 that uses libpoppler.so.3 and libpoppler-glib.so.3, and it was fast.
> But, when I temporarily removed libpoppler.so.3 and made a link of libpoppler.so.4 to libpoppler.so.3, it got as slow as the SVN version.
> But I'm not really sure if libpoppler is the only problem, because the opposite is not true. When I make a symlink from .so.3 to .so.4 and use SVN version, it doesn't get faster. It only works with stable version.
Yes, my results look like yours. It is only unusable at 1600%.
The both settings are in the fastest mode.
It's not really that slow without much zoom, but with Inkscape 0.46 it is faster.
---
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:09:34 +0000 /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 315079 glib.so. 4 , when you get closer to a blurred box, for example, it gets really slow to refresh the view when you scroll or move. glib.so. 3, and it was fast.
> From: <email address hidden>
> To: <email address hidden>
> Subject: [Bug 315079] Re: SVN Slow view latency with filters (probably libpoppler issue)
>
> Fernando, it's not so slow for me (AMD 2GHz, 2GB RAM). In your example I
> can go down to 800% on the blur zone and it's slow but still quite
> usable. The whole screen is refreshed in 4 seconds at most (when I
> minimize and maximize). How deep did you zoom in? How long it takes -in
> seconds- to redraw the screen?
>
> Remember that there are two preferences: blur quality and filters
> quality. If only blur is that slow, change the blur (not filters)
> quality setting to lowest quality. Maybe it wasn't clear in my message
> #1, since I used the word "filter" instead of "blur".
>
> --
> SVN Slow view latency with filters (probably libpoppler issue)
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Inkscape: A Vector Drawing Tool: New
>
> Bug description:
> When upgrading to SVN, that starts using libpoppler.so.4 and libpoppler-
>
> To test it, I used the Ubuntu's stable version 0.46 that uses libpoppler.so.3 and libpoppler-
> But, when I temporarily removed libpoppler.so.3 and made a link of libpoppler.so.4 to libpoppler.so.3, it got as slow as the SVN version.
> But I'm not really sure if libpoppler is the only problem, because the opposite is not true. When I make a symlink from .so.3 to .so.4 and use SVN version, it doesn't get faster. It only works with stable version.
_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ __ www.microsoft. com/spain/ windowsmobile/ messenger/ default. mspx
Llévate Messenger en el móvil a todas partes ¡Conéctate!
http://