Comment 2 for bug 244810
Revision history for this message
| ceg (ceg) wrote Re: inconsistency with the --no-degraded option | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
demo site
(Get the code!)
Example: 3 member mirroring array
A)
One disk fails during uptime, raid keeps running with 2 disks and on a reboot the array will get started through the --no-degraded or --incremental command with 2 disks.
B)
One disk fails during downtime, the array won't be started with --no-degraded or --incremental. A specific --run is necessary to start it degraded.