>> Rhys, how do we want to progress this issue? The general concern
>> definitely seems valid, but it seems like we don't want to fork
>> the Shibboleth packaging, so it seems like it would be desirable
>> for Janet to raise the issue with the Shibboleth consortium. How
>> do we make that happen?
Josh> Do we have any other issues that we want to bring to the
Josh> Consortium's attention? Or is this a one off?
>>>>> "Josh" == Josh Howlett <email address hidden> writes:
>> Rhys, how do we want to progress this issue? The general concern
>> definitely seems valid, but it seems like we don't want to fork
>> the Shibboleth packaging, so it seems like it would be desirable
>> for Janet to raise the issue with the Shibboleth consortium. How
>> do we make that happen?
Josh> Do we have any other issues that we want to bring to the
Josh> Consortium's attention? Or is this a one off?
The Centos xerces and xml-security mess.