unless you can explain to me how it works against rpm-4.x without any actual rpm headers installed, i'm not OK with p.masking
i'm not going to argue the relative merits of rpm vs net-snmp as you're most likely correct, but masking one package so that you can ignore bugs in another doesnt sound like the route to go for any set of packages
unless you can explain to me how it works against rpm-4.x without any actual rpm headers installed, i'm not OK with p.masking
i'm not going to argue the relative merits of rpm vs net-snmp as you're most likely correct, but masking one package so that you can ignore bugs in another doesnt sound like the route to go for any set of packages