Comment 3 for bug 714289
Revision history for this message
| Roman Marynchak (roman-marynchak) wrote | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
demo site
(Get the code!)
Well, I don't think that many people will deliberately bind the same symbol twice, and this error is not likely to break the legacy code compilation. In case you look at the language in general, most cases of duplicate bindings are errors (in LET, in LOOP etc.). So I support the idea to make this case an error too, though it is still disputable.