Comment 6 for bug 1627239

Hi,
this bug should not be reported against the apparmor package. The profile /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox belongs to the firefox package. Also I did not face the problem on all machines, investigating this I found machines where is a link from /etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox to /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox does not face the problem (oviously because apparmor is entirely disabled for this machine). Now /etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox does not belong to any package, so I assume I created it in mid 2015 because of other problems with firefox. A lot of other people might have done the same, so they do not have a problem with firefox, except for the security hole...