Comment 6 for bug 2039719

Hey Jorge,

Thanks for clarifying!

The return value is a functional change, and might generate compiler warnings depending on gcc version (orr even errors if built with `gcc -Werror`, which is not the case here -- the build works), so since it's a simple backport to have the function patched too, let's keep this hunk.

Yes, you're right; I missed Jammy, thanks!