Comment 8 for bug 912031

Rather than saying "date" in the last post I should have said "time-stamp". I suppose because things are wacky in Oneiric nautilus showing the time last audited. I'll include a screenshot of nautilus just for clarification but I've triple checked to be sure I was using Ubuntu i386 20120131.2, and I was! And it passes the integrity test!

The attached screenshot is therefore unrelated but I'll likely not report it as a bug until after iso-testing is complete just due to time constraints.

Arrgh, now even that has changed somewhat :^(

But you can still see that the time last modified exceeds my local time by ten minutes. It had previously shown several hours!