| 2018-02-28 18:05:57 |
Nish Aravamudan |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2018-02-28 18:09:06 |
Nish Aravamudan |
summary |
ubuntu-support-status could more clearly define the meanings of support status |
ubuntu-support-status could more clearly define unsupported |
|
| 2018-02-28 18:09:10 |
Nish Aravamudan |
description |
Related to LP: #1574670, which has cleaned up the output significantly.
The 'unsupported' status does not mean you won't get support at all (that is, please still file bugs, and possibly someone will work on it). Right now it reads like those packages are abandoned in Ubuntu (IMO). |
Related to LP: #1574670, which has cleaned up the output significantly.
The 'unsupported' status does not mean you won't get support at all (that is, please still file bugs, and possibly someone will work on it). Right now it reads like those packages are abandoned in Ubuntu (IMO).
I think it would be good to use tags to define the various categories and define those tags at the top (header) output, e.g.: |
|
| 2018-02-28 18:10:06 |
Nish Aravamudan |
description |
Related to LP: #1574670, which has cleaned up the output significantly.
The 'unsupported' status does not mean you won't get support at all (that is, please still file bugs, and possibly someone will work on it). Right now it reads like those packages are abandoned in Ubuntu (IMO).
I think it would be good to use tags to define the various categories and define those tags at the top (header) output, e.g.: |
Related to LP: #1574670, which has cleaned up the output significantly.
The 'unsupported' status does not mean you won't get support at all (that is, please still file bugs, and possibly someone will work on it). Right now it reads like those packages are abandoned in Ubuntu (IMO).
These are packages in universe without any teams signed up to support them. They are still maintained, though. |
|
| 2018-02-28 18:13:25 |
Marc Deslauriers |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Marc Deslauriers |
| 2018-02-28 18:29:13 |
Nish Aravamudan |
description |
Related to LP: #1574670, which has cleaned up the output significantly.
The 'unsupported' status does not mean you won't get support at all (that is, please still file bugs, and possibly someone will work on it). Right now it reads like those packages are abandoned in Ubuntu (IMO).
These are packages in universe without any teams signed up to support them. They are still maintained, though. |
Related to LP: #1574670, which has cleaned up the output significantly.
The 'unsupported' status does not mean you won't get support at all (that is, please still file bugs, and possibly someone will work on it). Right now it reads like those packages are abandoned in Ubuntu (IMO).
These are packages in universe without any teams signed up to support them. They are still maintained, though.
In general, in the tool, 'support' has a clear meaning (not currently emitted):
10:27 < mdeslaur> perhaps the tool should say what support means... "Security
updates and important bug fixes" or something
I think it would be ideal to provide either a header or footer that defines support and unsupported as expressed by the tool. |
|
| 2018-02-28 18:29:14 |
Nish Aravamudan |
summary |
ubuntu-support-status could more clearly define unsupported |
ubuntu-support-status could more clearly define 'support' |
|
| 2018-03-05 17:01:20 |
Brian Murray |
tags |
|
rls-bb-incoming |
|
| 2019-01-28 20:15:29 |
Brian Murray |
tags |
rls-bb-incoming |
rls-dd-incoming |
|
| 2019-03-20 19:51:04 |
Brian Murray |
update-manager (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Triaged |
|
| 2019-03-20 19:51:18 |
Brian Murray |
update-manager (Ubuntu): importance |
Undecided |
Low |
|
| 2019-05-31 18:54:50 |
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre |
tags |
rls-dd-incoming |
rls-ee-incoming |
|
| 2019-07-16 14:33:36 |
Tom Reynolds |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Tom Reynolds |
