On 11-02-14 06:44 PM, Martin [gz] wrote:
> My shell provides history anyway, and path completion as an option,
> readline is mostly redundant and feels alien.
If you're using "bzr shell", then your own shell's facilities are not
relevant. Why do you mention them?
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11-02-14 06:44 PM, Martin [gz] wrote:
> My shell provides history anyway, and path completion as an option,
> readline is mostly redundant and feels alien.
If you're using "bzr shell", then your own shell's facilities are not
relevant. Why do you mention them?
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk1 ZxF8ACgkQ0F+ nu1YWqI1AFgCeLz D3HFMUWrqbugqJd fcS+qbo y8Gup3xBJ4F7VJF yE
idwAn3Qg6CpcI6e
=3jp3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----